Difference between revisions of "Personality Traits in terms of Social-Role Probabilities; an innovative theoretical essay on the possibility of overcoming the chaotic diversity in personality theories"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
presented at the Third European Conference of Personality Gdansk, Poland, Sept. 23-26, 1986. | presented at the Third European Conference of Personality Gdansk, Poland, Sept. 23-26, 1986. | ||
| − | Heymans Bulletin HB-86-815-EX, State University of Groningen (RUG), Jan. 1987 | + | (Registered as Heymans Bulletin HB-86-815-EX, State University of Groningen (RUG), Jan. 1987) |
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
reactivity | reactivity | ||
rotations (oblique + orthogonal) self-will vs. compliance stability vs. over-sensitivity social roles subordinacy (styles of) | rotations (oblique + orthogonal) self-will vs. compliance stability vs. over-sensitivity social roles subordinacy (styles of) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == ABSTRACT == | ||
| + | Social Psychology and Personality Psychology have developed into separate disciplines. Personality psychologists seldom ask questions about the way social roles are distributed and come into existence and social psychologists rarely explore the influence of temperamental differences and other basic personality traits on the way social roles develop. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Focussing on the interface between these two research traditions, we can find anchoring points for factor rotations which can bring order to the unmanageable multiformity of classification systems, categorizations and theoretical approaches in personality- and social psychology. To that end some personality dimensions are defined on the level of congenital predispositions as well as in terms of social role distribution. They are, in fact, biologically based personality traits, defined in terms of the probability of obtaining specific social roles (-scores). | ||
| + | |||
| + | The use of such doubly defined personality dimensions as reference points can produce considerable conceptual and theoretical advantages for both the social-role and the trait domain. It can help us to integrate both disciplines without leading to desultory complexities. | ||
Revision as of 14:08, 17 June 2012
PERSONALITY TRAITS IN TERMS OF SOCIAL-ROLE PROBABILITIES (An innovative theoretical essay on the possibility of overcoming the chaotic diversity in personality theories)
by
Popko P. van der Molen
presented at the Third European Conference of Personality Gdansk, Poland, Sept. 23-26, 1986.
(Registered as Heymans Bulletin HB-86-815-EX, State University of Groningen (RUG), Jan. 1987)
Keywords : abilities and skills adaption vs. innovation anchoring dimensions dominance (styles) energy level genetic vs. environmental factors personality traits person- vs. thing-orientedness reactivity rotations (oblique + orthogonal) self-will vs. compliance stability vs. over-sensitivity social roles subordinacy (styles of)
ABSTRACT
Social Psychology and Personality Psychology have developed into separate disciplines. Personality psychologists seldom ask questions about the way social roles are distributed and come into existence and social psychologists rarely explore the influence of temperamental differences and other basic personality traits on the way social roles develop.
Focussing on the interface between these two research traditions, we can find anchoring points for factor rotations which can bring order to the unmanageable multiformity of classification systems, categorizations and theoretical approaches in personality- and social psychology. To that end some personality dimensions are defined on the level of congenital predispositions as well as in terms of social role distribution. They are, in fact, biologically based personality traits, defined in terms of the probability of obtaining specific social roles (-scores).
The use of such doubly defined personality dimensions as reference points can produce considerable conceptual and theoretical advantages for both the social-role and the trait domain. It can help us to integrate both disciplines without leading to desultory complexities.
