Difference between revisions of "A guided tour through the Omega Research Wiki"

(This chapter is still under construction; figures and pictures are still to be added) (last update: april 2013)

(Nog er in verwerken: inhoud van "Eating from the Forbidden Fruit")

 

 

== '''Introduction''' ==

{{level|1}}'' This Guided Tour chapter is added to this Wiki for your efficiency and comfort.

On this Wiki it is pointed out how peculiar, how strange, how exciting and how dangerous this human situation is today and explains why this is the case.  

The Wiki ends with explaining the transition that mankind will pass through and how and why this transition is coming about.

These various research lines are each discussed in detail in one of the separate chapters on this Wiki.  

Surprisingly, what emerges after combining the various relevant research lines, is a total picture that on the one hand highlights some peculiar characteristics of the precarious present human situation and that on the other hand also reveils a number of unavoidable changes that will most likely follow soon. These expected changes are labeled the Point Omega transition, a term, borrowed from the French 20th century jesuit priest Teilhard de Chardin, who coined it for describing a major transition in human development and wellbeing that he expected to come in a not too far future.

It is shown on this Wiki that the expected (Point Omega) changes are indeed, as Teilhard argued, likely to be more profound and strange than any change in the history of mankind we have ever seen yet. The Point Omega changes are expected to be more far reaching than any previous invention, be it tool-making, the use of fire, the invention of the wheel or even agriculture. And because of their unfamiliarity these expected changes can only be imagined by most people with great difficulty. This Wiki, and thus this Guided Tour to start with, are meant to make this collection of coming strange phenomena better imaginable.  

In this concise Guided Tour we will just mention the various research lines and their conclusions in brief and indicate how the various chunks of information do fit together and lead to more comprehensive conclusions about the human condition and the human fate. For details of each separate chunk of information, the reader can refer to the separate chapters about each specific issue.

Apart from presenting new data from the above mentioned lines of research, we will also discuss a number of familiar phenomena, but we will explain how these familiar phenomena can be viewed in a novel way, highlighting the role of each in the present predicaments of humanity.

In view of everything that is known and scientifically established, it should, from a purely technical point of view, and according to the information presented here, in principle not be very difficult to (re-)organize our societies in such a way that the most crucial and common human problems and dangers are overcome and disappear for good. It is argued on this Wiki that the major problem is to mobilize all available knowledge and to remove the taboos and superstitions that, until now, blocked the intelligent use of the knowledge that is available and has in fact been available for quite some time already.

=== For your efficiency and comfort ===

The various contributions on this Wiki greatly differ in detail, in length, in depth and in thoroughness of scientific underpinning of arguments and proof. This Guided Tour helps you to choose the sequence of articles that suits you best. Do you want a better overview first or are you looking for a better underpinning of arguments and of presented data? You can follow your preference at any place during the Tour. You may decide to dig deeper into the subject you are immersed in, or, reversely, you may return to the surface and look for a better and broader overview. The Guided Tour will give you such moments of choice during reading and browsing.

For your convenience we therefore have marked the articles and contributions with asterixes (*), (**), (***).

*(★)<level 1> '''Quick and efficient''': Stands for an overview article, short, superficial, quick and efficient. These articles are best to start out with. They are the ones that the Guided Tour brings you first.  

*(★★)<level 2> '''Some more detail''': Stands for reading one level more deeply. These articles give more thorough argumentation, but do not lead you into the depths of scientific corroboration and into a lengthy underpinning of presented data.

Throughout this Guided Tour we occasionally have put some of the '''basic issues in bold'''. This may be handy for quick scanning the texts while browsing around to find your way to what you prefer to read next.

* You may also be concerned about the dangers of nuclear self destruction by mankind and want to find out about the roots of war and conflict.

Whatever the reason of you visiting this Wiki, all these approaches are dealt with and you will see that neither of these issues can be understood without understanding the other issues as well. It is the total, coherent, picture that brings clarity and understanding, an understanding that neither of the separate approaches of information could possibly bring by itself alone.

=== Human survival ===

{{level|1}} This Wiki is about the way humanity will '''overcome the''' problems resulting from the present world wide '''population explosion''' and will '''survive this nuclear era''', surviving the methods and tools for mass destruction that have become available. It is also about how humanity will manage to '''enter its next phase in evolution'''. As will be argued, this next phase is a phase with less mass unhappiness and suffering, a phase in which the evolutionary need for large scale wars and the all overruling need for the systematic suppression and neurotisation of people has disappeared.

While going, this Wiki provides quite some new data that have not yet been generally known before, new data that help to point out to us how we will survive and how we will create a more agreeable world.

It is argued that humanity will discover these data, these truths, '''unavoidably and automatically''' by itself anyway, whether they are presented at this place or not, and why this is necessarily and unavoidably going to happen any way.

What this Wiki is aiming at, is to bring understanding at a timely moment, in order to make adaptation to the new situation easier and make it happen more smoothly. This Wiki can thus serve as a midwife, making the birth of a new era easier and on a personal level help you to find your way out of the clutches of the old power structures that made the lives of all of us so miserable for thousands of years.

== '''issues to take into account''' ==

{{level|1}} In searching for the roots of human misery and of the most pressing problems in our societies, the following 4 issues have to be addressed, phenomena that are widely known, but the significance of which for prevailing human misery is often not very clear.

These first 4 phenomena are:

<ol start="1">

<li>'''Superstition and ignorance''' in human society and [[Eating_from_the_Forbidden_Fruit#The_evolutionary_importance_of_blindness_for_self_and_the_illusion_of_Good_and_Bad|their evolutionary role]] '''(**)'''.</li>

<li>'''Taboos''' and their function in human societies.</li>

<li>[[The_effects_of_genetic_pollution_on_political_structures_and_human_history|'''Genetic pollution''']] '''(**)''' and its effects in human societies.</li>

In this guided tour the role and function of these familiar concepts #1 to #4 will be briefly mentioned.  

While going it will be indicated where on this Wiki each of these issues is discussed in more detail.

Apart from the above mentioned 4 phenomena, each playing its role in present day human existence, we will in this Wiki also discuss 5 other phenomena that are not widely known yet. These 5 issues are:

<li>'''Selection Cycles in Social Structure'''s, and</li>

We will now briefly indicate what these 5 novel concepts stand for.

# The first point is that in general we humans are very little aware of how we function, how we feel, how our emotions are triggered and why and how we interact with one another. There is an avalanche of scientific psychological research data showing the existence and the working of these '''blindnesses''' in detail. It is indicated here why it has been an evolutionary necessity in us humans that such blindnesses evolved and have been and still are ruling our lives until this day.

# The second unfamiliar issue addressed is one of the basic and very important characteristics of our emotional and motivational system, which is the phenomenon of '''emotional "Reversals"'''. Whereas one of the most basic parts of our biological make up, we are in general fully unaware of these mechanisms. And that is highly peculiar for a species that prides itself for its "superior" intelligence. But it is easy to understand in the light of the above mentioned all overruling human '''Self-blindness'''. Once we understand the dynamics of our emotional reversals, we also can start to understand how humanity lost most of its capacity to learn and develop by playful and curious interaction, a pleasant and effective condition which basically is its birthright.

# The third unfamiliar issue is the finding that the world of Homo sapiens is not ruled by human persons, but rather by impersonal '''meme level power structures'''. In this Wiki we deal with the consequences of these meme level power structures for us human beings, making us live in a highly uncomfortable splits.

# The fourth unfamiliar issue is a '''behaviour genetic social selection mechanism''' operating in any socially living mammal species, that renders limits to the life span of social structures and that produces an important boost to the spreading and the reshuffling of genes in the gene pool.

# The fifth issue summarizes the changes that can be expected to happen in the near future and the reasons why these changes will happen. These changes can only happen together, not separate from one another. The occurrence of these changes together is labeled with the term '''"Point Omega"'''.

Elsewhere on this Wiki we present a 4 page summary of the 5 novel concepts mentioned above.  

In case you want to read this 4 page summary now first, [[Point Omega (summary)|click here '''(*)''']].

Otherwise, in case you want to dive deeper immediately, just read on. In that case we will

Apart from the four relatively novel concepts mentioned above, we will now first mention briefly some other phenomena that we need to take into account if we wish to achieve a fuller understanding of the present situation, the present predicaments of the human species. First we will very briefly sketch how these phenomena roughly fit together and lead to a more coherent picture of the human situation. Subsequently, we will dive deeper into each separate subject and gradually construct a total, coherent view in more detail.

Other than the above 4 novel concepts, the following 4 phenomena are already more commonly known, but often not applied in the context that we need here.

********* (naar elders)

As a start you might read the ''[[Point Omega (summary)|4 page summary of Point Omega]].

Without going into details, that summary describes the following four, very different, phenomena. These four phenomena are novel in the sense that they are not yet widely known. They are either unknown or only known in a limited circle of specialized scientists. Together with other, more widely known phenomena, they form one grand coherent picture describing the present human situation, at the personal level as well as at the collective level.

{{level|2}} As explained in detail in [[The biological instability of social equilibria|other chapters on this Wiki]](***), there is an important behaviour-genetic mechanism operating in any socially living mammal species, that renders limits to the life span of social structures and that produces an important boost to the spreading and the reshuffling of genes in the gene pool.  

In socially living mammals there exists genetic variance in the innate propensity to behave more or less social versus behaving less or more individualistic and creative. Within social structures there always operates a selection pressure in favour of social compliance and against individualistic explorativeness and creativity. Since these trait differences do have a strong genetical basis, this selection pressure brings about irreversible changes in the average behavioural make up of the group members. The consequences is that:

- This life span is inversely proportional to the effectiveness of the selection pressure in individuals against self-willed creativity.

The latter social processes have in common that they had not yet been understood until now. However, we have to pay attention to this mechanism here, because it is to a high degree the source of many forms of human misery and represents one of the greatest contemporary dangers to human survival. Therefore this mechanism is introduced here as '''novel''' (because still large and by unknown) '''information piece # 9'''.

To the superficial observer it may seem rather counter-productive to carry a mechanism that functions as a time bomb underneath every social structure, being the cause of an eventual, but unavoidable, catastrophic turn over event. Such catastrophic events normally bring with them large percentages of the population to be expelled or terminated in a direct or less direct way. This seems like an enormous waste of energy, skills and capacity in the system.  

We simply have no choice but to start to understand these mechanisms and then subsequently steer these processes consciously and rationally in the desired direction, taking the sting and the pushing power out of the "periodic catastrophy" machine.

This, together with genetic pollution, always has been the cause of periodic redistribution of gene pools over the inhabitable areas of land, also triggering migration waves. Once understood, we can in principle deal with both mechanisms without much difficulty.  

{{level|1}} Up to this point we mentioned in brief 9 phenomena and mechanisms that are considered of importance for understanding the major problems mankind is facing. These were: #1, self-blindness that enabled higher intelligence to evolve, but hampers a proper monitoring of our own behaviour; #2, emotional and motivational reversals ruling personal development in both favourable and unfavourable directions; #3, meme-level power structures ruling human societies; #4, a Point Omega transition to be expected; #5, present day superstition and ignorance; #6, taboos as guiding devices; #7, genetic pollution in human societies; #8, neuroticism as major tool of meme-level power structures; #9, selection cycles in social structures.  

As we will see, there are very good evolutionary reasons why humanity up to this moment in time has never been able to solve the most pressing questions and riddles that have presented themselves to us during already many thousands of years. Evolution needed us to be blind. Important things that really mattered to us stayed hidden from view all the time. They stayed hidden from our capacity to understand, covered up by '''''superstition and misunderstanding (# 5)'''.''

Once we will have understood the grand picture nevertheless and once we have studied and checked also the details, it will also be understood why this statae of ignorance is the case.  

In order to get some more overview, let's make a little tour through the different realms of pressing human problems. Let's dive a little deeper and consider in more detail the different numbered phenomena mentioned above, relating each of them in turn to one or more of the major problems mankind is facing.

Some philosophers have pointed out that a well oiled and fair operated society that manages to maintain peace within its realm, basically is a "project postponing evolution" or a "conspiracy against evolution". What they mean is that humanity, just like any other animal species, is subject to processes of natural selection and that without being subjected to such evolutionary selection processes, a species cannot survive. Genetic drift and '''''genetic pollution (# 7)''''' would in that case reduce the quality level of that society's members to such an extent, that eventually, within a limited number of generations, it would not any more be able to meet the competition with neighbouring societies and sooner or later be overwhelmed and replaced by another societal structure which is still backed up by more genetic vigour.

In other words, the longer and more just and fair the peace has been, the more the average quality level has dropped and the sooner competing societal structures will take over.  

And when that happens, we are facing total '''''disruption of society, collapse of protective structures, war, starvation, mass destruction, enslavement, genocide''''', or any combination of these unpleasant phenomena. '''(# 9)'''

And, apart from outright actions of war and purposeful destruction, there are also a number of other mechanisms that may cause our organized societies to collapse after some period of seeming order and peace. See for instance here[http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/280/1754/20122845.full] for a recent overview by Ehrlich and Ehrlich (2013) of the predicaments and inescapable looming disasters humanity is facing today.  

If we want to get to grips with issues of '''''war and peace''''' and other looming disasters, we will therefore at least have to understand how all this works.

Many issues of such selection and competition mechanisms are well known and investigated at length in scientific areas like (behavioural) genetics, population genetics, economy, etc. However, this type of knowledge has rarely been applied to thinking about the fate of mankind itself. For instance, population genetics theory has quite successfully been applied in matters of cattle breeding and such, but the implications for the human species has always been kept in '''''taboo''''' spheres '''(# 6)'''. These are issues one "should not speak or even think about".

So, many notions and tools that we would need to get a better understanding about matters of war and peace are in principle readily available, if we only put ourselves to simply utilize them, breaking eventual '''''taboos''''' where needed.

[[Image:HZZ 3 aapjes.jpeg|800px]]  

  [[Image:HZZ Hans vd Sande.jpeg|800px]]  

[[The effects of genetic pollution on political structures and human history|'''''Genetic pollution (**)''''']] is one such issue '''(# 7)'''. It can easily be understood and estimated as to quantity of damage, what genetic pollution is doing to any society that has managed to establish a certain measure of fairness and justness and peace.

What is not generally known yet, also not in scientific research communities on these subjects, is a certain type of selection pressure, operating within any socially living group of mammals, that causes certain specific '''''social selection cycles''''' with a certain life span. In other words, this type of internal social selection pressure '''''works as a built in time bomb in any social structure (# 9)''''' in socially living mammals. The evolutionary advantages can easily be understood. Here we will limit ourselves to just mention the phenomenon and point out that elsewhere on this Wiki this social selection mechanism causing cyclic changes in social structures is [[The biological instability of social equilibria|described in more detail '''(***)''']], including evidence from scientific research.

  ((of zo'n plaatje er op geschilderd zoals je in die Johova-boekjes ziet met een leeuw vredig liggend naast het lam))

In short, two major factors that are often overlooked when investigating issues of '''''war and peace (# 4)''''' are: '''''genetic pollution (# 7)''''' and the '''''life cycles of social structures by internal social selection forces (# 9).'''''

The latter mechanism is producing the quickest limiting effects on the life span of any project that is trying to maintain peace, fairness and "justice". The effects of genetic pollution work a bit slower. So, here we have one population genetic mechanism, that is virtually unknown yet, even in circles of professionals (although these mechanisms have already been published more than 30 years ago). But it is rather easy to understand. However, if we want to asses its effects on human society and on our own lives, we also have to dive into the mechanisms of our own social interactions and social reflexes that motor these cyclic selection processes.  

Looking into that matter, we quickly stumble across another issue that is crucial to our understanding and that is the quite peculiar '''''human capacity to be [[Point_Omega_(summary)#Self_Blindness_and_Social-role_Blindness|blind for one's own and to a lesser extent be blind to other people's behaviour (*)]](# 1)'''''. It can be shown experimentally that human beings have a conspicuous incapacity to asses their own and each other's behavioural intentions, qualities and capacities. This in turn has consequences for the workings of the above mentioned involuntary internal social selection pressures in human social structures, causing '''''limited lifespans of any social structures''''' involved, and with concomitant '''''[[The_biological_instability_of_social_equilibria#Life_cycles_of_social_groups_and_structures|turn over catastrophies (***)]]''''' going with it, in the form of '''''bankruptcy, revolutions, genocide (# 9)''''', etc.

So, we need to know also about the specific '''''[[Point_Omega_(summary)#Self_Blindness_and_Social-role_Blindness|blindnesses (*)(# 1)]]''''' humans are saddled with, that make the eons old and still unhampered selection pressures possible to continue operating in spite of humanity's high level of intelligence. Therefore this Wiki contains also contributions about '''''[[Eating_from_the_Forbidden_Fruit|Amathology or the science of ignorance (**)(# 1)]]'''''.  

Without an understanding of the mechanisms of ignorance, innate as well as imposed from without, we cannot hope to come to grips with matters of '''''war and peace''''', nor with matters regarding '''''human unhappiness and suffering (# 4)'''''.  

=== More bits and pieces needed to complete the puzzle and create effective understanding ===

{{level|1}} Investigating these phenomena, we also want to know how human understanding can enhance or moderate or change the various mechanisms studied. Therefore we need to know how human learning and development can be of influence on such selection reflexes as mentioned above. To what extent can human beings overcome the '''''innate and [[Eating_from_the_Forbidden_Fruit#Power_structures_utilizing_.22jet-lag.22_effects_in_human_evolution|culturally amplified blindness and ignorance (**)(# 1)]]''''' and start to come to grips with social reflexes that in general, unchequed, lead to mayhem and disaster ?

This Wiki contains the details of a still rather novel and little known [[Point_Omega_(summary)#Reversal_Theory_of_Emotions_and_Motivations|theory of learning '''(*)''']] (although also already published more than 30 years ago), based on Reversal Theory and explaining how the contageousness of human development as well as of '''''human neuroticism''''' works and how human development and growth is influenced by social interaction.  

   ((neurotisch stress-hoofd; etc.))  ((bijv. te halen uit T-shirt CEL plaatje; kan ik voor zorgen))

The understanding coming forth from this novel theory of learning is laid down in the '''''[[Towards_a_Cognition-Energy-Learning_Model|CEL (***)]]''''' (Cognition Energy Learning model)'''(# 2)'''. It describes '''how we gather experiences and how we learn and grow'''. It also describes how human development and learning is ruled by very strong positive feed back loops. Such loops do cause so called "developmental traps". That is, once a person has entered a series of positive learning spirals, his or her development is becoming more likely to develop positively in the future also. And reversely, once a person has ended up in a series of negative learning spirals, his/her further development is likely to become more and more hampered. This is a mechanism ''within'' persons.

A similar effect can be found ''between'' people, mental and developmental health in a group of people having a strong positive effect on the developmental chances of individuals belonging to or dealing with such a group of people. But the reverse also holds. Within and between people there is a strong contagiousness in both directions.

In summary: "'''''Unpersons unperson persons" and "Persons re-person unpersons (# 2)'''"''.

These "positive feed back loops" in human learning and development, either in a healthy or in an unhealthy direction, and the concomitant developmental traps, do have strong implications for societies that have ended up in '''''structures of repression and misery (# 3)''''', which is mostly the case. And the reverse also holds, i.e., for societies that have managed to organise and escape from collective unhappiness and disaster (which happens only very rarely). So, these "positive feed back loops" create a certain stability in social structures. And it works both ways. An unhappy, stressful and neuriticizing society tends to stay that way, but also a supporting, happy society has a strong measure of built in stability, and the CEL explains why.

Thinking about '''''war and peace (# 4)''''', it is clear that we also do need the information from these particular lines of research.  

Having touched upon the mechanisms of human learning and development, we are dealing with '''''human suffering and misery''''' on the one hand and '''''human'' ''enlightenment and liberation (# 2)''''' on the other hand, either in individuals or in whole populations. It is argued on this Wiki that, once we have acquired a rather complete overview of all these different but intertwined mechanisms, we discover the likelihood of a transition in the functioning of the human species, that is looking like what the catholic scholar and priest Teilhard de Chardin was writing about, "'''''Point Omega (# 4)'''"'', a transition point that is estimated here to be rather near in time. From Teilhard de Chardin we have therefore borrowed the label for this Wiki.

Looking at these issues of human learning and development and of the peculiar and specific human areas of '''''blindness (# 1)''''', the question arises how these states of affairs have ever been able to be ESS's (Evolutionarily Stable Strategies). How can it be that a certain species, Homo sapiens, does have certain capacities for learning and development while most persons in most large societies do not "realise" those potentials at all, but only develop into '''''truncated, limited phenotypes, neurotic and relatively miserable (# 2)''''' ?

In this Wiki it is postulated that this is indeed a phenomenon that is highly unusual, if not for evolutionary reasons generally impossible in the animal kingdom, but that in the case of human evolution we are facing a unique species in a unique situation in which this strange anomaly does indeed make evolutionary sense in a rather strange and unique way.

The point is that '''''Homo sapiens has escaped the so called "upper intelligence limit (# 10)"'''''. That is a boundary that usually limits the evolution of intelligence in any phylum in the animal kingdom. Any intelligence above a certain functional level, becomes self-defeating and stops being an ESS, because intelligence above that level usually bites its own tail. A high level of intelligence namely, enables individuals to find short cuts to proximate behavioural gratification loops, bypassing the more simplistic, but more costly, behaviours that ordinarily were designed by evolution to gratify those needs, while at the same time producing behaviour favouring ultimate procreational goals and results. Thus intelligence, if above a certain level, tends to cause a mismatch between proximate and ultimate behavioural systems. They stop running parallel. Intelligence enables an individual to "misuse" or "shortcut" proximate need-gratification loops, creating more easy gratification methods, but thus avoiding the risky or costly behaviours that evolution had meant to be be triggered by the innate needs in question in the first place, in order to optimise procreation.

The fact that '''''Homo sapiens escaped this intelligence boundary''''' explains why we have such '''''conspicuous awareness blocks regarding our own behaviour (# 1)'''''. This unique type of "'''''blindness'''''" must have been introduced in our genome before the high growth of intelligence could take off, or latest simultaneously. So, it is probably an adaptation that is at least - guess - a quarter to two million years old.

This peculiar characteristic of us humans plays a crucial role in a number of other mechanisms that we need to take into consideration when we want to understand the present human situation. This specific '''''[[Point_Omega_(summary)#Self_Blindness_and_Social-role_Blindness|blindness for the self (*)(# 1)]]''''' is a strong moderating factor for a number of the other mechanisms discussed on this Wiki.

Another important factor on the level of human awareness is the '''''selection pressure in favour of docile behaviour (# 9)''''' and against intelligent enquiry that started some 10.000 years ago at the beginning of the agricultural revolution. From that time on the ordinary (human) autonomy was gradually replaced by the influence of meme level power structures. All mechanisms as discussed above must be seen in the light of the evolutionary struggle, not between people, but between impersonal power structures, a struggle in which we human beings are merely the carriers of the meme sets struggling for survival and supremacy. In this struggle the main requirement for us humans is to be docile and reliable carriers of meme sets, cultural sets of ideas and recipes that together "make" a culture.

=== How to put all bits and pieces together; three bits, still missing ===

{{level|1}} How now about tackling the perennial problems humanity has been struggling with since time immemorial? If we try to fit the assembled data together in one comprehensive model, there appear to be still a few conspicuous "gaps" in the tool set that we have available.

These "gaps" are novel concepts that are so basic for our understanding that missing them makes it almost impossible to figure out how the different jig saw pieces, the different sets of info, should be arranged to solve the puzzle.

Many concepts introduced on this Wiki are new and unfamiliar, but easy to explain and to understand.

Three of these new notions in particular are basic for being able to understand the most important mechanisms involved. They were already briefly mentioned above, but do take a bit more space, attention and effort now, to grasp and understand more fully.

  ((puzzel met nog slechts 3 ontbrekende, grotere, stukjes)) (Uit schilderij van Abdul Mati Klarwein o.i.d.)

One of the three missing pieces '''(#2)''' is the '''[[Towards_a_Cognition-Energy-Learning_Model (1)|CEL, the Cognition Energy learning model (***)]]''' as developed by van der Molen (1984, 1991), based on the Reversal Theory by Apter and Smith. Without this model of learning and development the issue of contagiousness within and between persons cannot be fully understood, nor the consequences for the wider issues of misery versus well being as well as the issues of war and peace.

Whereas very basic to all human affairs, for most people this learning model is rather counter-intuitive. This counter-intuitiveness is part of our innate "blindness for the Self" (see below). Therefore we need to pay some attention to this learning theory in order to overcome that part of our innate blindness and to be able to grasp the broad picture.

A second concept playing a crucial role '''(#9)''' is the also relatively novel model of '''social selection pressure and population cycles'''. That mechanism causes the life spans of social organisations to be only limited. Understanding this mechanisms is also rather crucial for understanding processes of war, peace, survival and decay.

A third phenomenon '''(#1)''' that is large and by unknown until now, but that is of great importance to us if we wish to grasp the essentials of our present evolutionary predicaments fully, is our '''"blindness for the Self"'''. This typically human incapacity to consider its own and each other's behaviour soberly, poses strong blocks to a rational and purposeful approach in solving the most pressing present day human predicaments and challenges. These blocks stem from various sources, innate as well as induced or enlarged by external causes. It can be argued that these human blindnesses have evolved because of the unique evolutionary situation we are in, being the carriers of unprecedented levels of intelligence in evolution.

== '''The C.E.L. (Cognition Energy Learning model)''', missing piece #2  ==

'''{{level|1}} How we gather experience, learn and develop'''  

“[[The evolutionary stability of a bi-stable system of emotions and motivations in species with an open-ended capacity for learning|Reversal Theory]]” '''(***)''' (developed by Apter and Smith) explains the emotional and motivational dynamics that form the basics of our learning process. The basic principles are explained in a different chapter with graphs, pictures and examples.

For more details [[The evolutionary stability of a bi-stable system of emotions and motivations in species with an open-ended capacity for learning#Reversal Theory|see there '''(**)''']]

Since these mechanisms of emotions and motivations are the very basis of our behaviour and thus of our very existence, awareness of these mechanisms is of crucial importance. It is striking and highly peculiar, that awareness of these mechanisms has not always already been our normal state. On the contrary, our cultures invariably have taken care of blinding us specifically for these basic aspects of our existence, utilizing and enhancing the already innate specific human blindness for the self, establishing and maintaining numerous structures to consolidate that blindness. Becoming aware of the reversal mechanisms in our emotional organization is therefore a key to any attempt of mankind to (re)gain autonomy.

Once these basic mechanisms of collecting and digesting experience, and from there the dynamics of learning, are understood, it is much easier to optimize instructional and educational methods, helping to enlighten mankind. In fact, this very theory can render the tools to boost self-actualization processes on a massive scale. It enables people to effortlessly enhance and stimulate general developmental processes in one another. Click [[Energy_and_Strokes|'''here''']]'''(***)''' for more details.  

=== Explanatory power of the C.E.L.===

{{level|1}}The CEL explains how animals with an open ended learning capacity do have an emotional and motivational system that is designed to maximize the use they can make of any surplus energy and time available. In case there is not enough energy available, this system directs the individual to seeking cover, safety and rest, in order to restore as quickly as possible the internal energy balance. However, if there is energy available, the individual is "pushed" to spend that energy, also in case there is no problem to be solved at that very moment, on acquiring new experiences an thus gather more knowledge of the world around. The CEL is organized in such a way, that automatically that surplus of energy of an individual is directed towards those ("exiting") areas of experience where the individual does not yet have sufficient knowledge and experience. In those areas the individual still can learn something useful, because there is not yet full mastery. Only by the time that in that specific area of the world around, in that specific area of experience, there has been gathered enough experience and also enough knowledge, that area in question is "mastered". By that time that area is experienced as "boring" in the paratelic state and will therefore not be further explored when sufficient energy is available, because not "exiting" any more. From that time on the energy will be spent on more exiting areas of exploration.  

In that way the CEL directs any energy surplus towards experiencing and learning particularly about those areas of life where the individual can profit most from expansion of its experience and knowledge.

Betwéén people a similar contagiousness exists. The [[Energy_and_Strokes#Chapter_2._An_Extension_of_the_Cognition-Energy-Learning_Model|'''CEL''' explains]]'''(***)''' how emotional and physical support from other people may help to restore the emotional balance in the supported individuals. And such restored balance in turn stimulates an easier emergence of paratelic states. In tense and neurotic people the paratelic states are in general too little prominent. Their frequency is too low. Social support and help can cure that.

So, also between people the CEL shows that there is a high contageousness. Living in a group of self-actualizers heightens the chances to enter in optimal learning spirals also and find ones' way towards self-actualization. And reversely, living in a group of neurotics with truncated behavioural systems, one will find less social support and help and as a consequence one will not be able to restore the telic/paratelic balance easily and one is more likely to also stay trapped in neurotic and truncated behaviour patterns oneself.

It is pointed out in the pages about the CEL that present day humanity is in general trapped in negative learning spirals and operates on a level that is far below what would be possible in terms of our genetic endowment. From an evolutionary point of view this situation, an animal species, us humans, of which most individuals do not realise their full innate potential, is highly peculiar, if not almost unbelievable. If human beings would be more often well balanced, they would be more often self-actualizers and not be stuck in truncated and less effective behaviour patterns.

On the whole our civilizations appear to be trapped in a system that blocks the full expansion of human possibilities and that keeps us bound in neurotic misery.

However, the CEL indicates that, from a technical point of view, the opposite would in theory also be possible, and also would be stable in itself.

For reasons that are now easy to understand, our evolution has directed us towards this one of the two basic options, the unpleasant one.

For more detailed information about Reversal Theory and the Cognition Energy Learning model (the CEL) click [[Towards_a_Cognition-Energy-Learning_Model|'''here''']] '''(***)'''.

Otherwise continue reading.

  ((grote plaat(je) van CEL (achterkant); of meer naar voren ?; doe ik wel, ligt al klaar)) ((geen puzzelstukje))

== '''Social Selection forces and Population Cycles''', missing piece #9 ==

{{level|1}} Never in human history one could put a permanent end to conflicts between social groups and organizations. One of the behavioural mechanisms making that impossible is the involuntary selection pressure within groups. Essential in this mechanism is a certain kind of social-role blindness, a peculiar unawareness of what we are doing on the level of social-role interactions, whereby forces of attraction or repulsion between individuals are effectuated.  

Other elements of this mechanism are involuntary incrowd–outcast selection reflexes and a personality 'trait dimension', i.e. a dimension in which people differ from one another, which may be described as a `readiness to comply with a submissive role'. This dimension is correlated with ''a large amount of'' social behaviour and ''a small amount of'' thing-oriented, individualistic and explorative behaviour. It is, by definition, of great importance for the distribution of social roles and for the social structure in a group; it determines, for example, the likelihood of an individual assuming or maintaining a compliant and socially accepted subordinate position versus the likelihood of drifting into an outcast position. Knowledge about this innate personality trait dimension and of its effects in social groups and structures may increase our understanding of a wide range of intriguing and sometimes disquieting phenomena. These phenomena range from educational and organizational strategies to the often catastrophe-like collapses and turn-over phenomena in companies and other social structures, and from the way social roles and positions tend to be distributed up to the resulting evolutionary consequences.

  ((plaatje: finger-pointing and shame/fright; bijv. gelovige krimpt ineen onder de dreigende vinger van de ouderling of dominee))

From a purely biological point of view, differences between individuals are to be expected in any socially living mammalian species in a number of situations where choices have to be made. They regard for instance readiness to comply with a submissive role; sociability versus thing-orientedness; and compliance versus self-will. Individuals make up their mind all the time about these "choices". It can be argued that the underlying biological organization must, from an evolutionary standpoint, be very old and elementary. What is of importance here are the consequences of these behavioural differences on the level of social interaction. A life span theory of social structures and organizations (causing limited life spans) can be shown to be one of the implications.

It can be shown that the way these interpersonal differences are behaviourally organized (and the way our awareness tends to be blocked in these respects) have far reaching consequences; an increase in our understanding of the life cycles of social structures might be by far their most important result. Such understanding enables us to map the processes underlying periodic catastrophe-like turn-over phenomena and to learn how to control their decreasing efficiency and violent backlashing at any level of organization.  

  ((phenix uit de as herrijzend))and ((collapse and catastrophe))  ((zaagtand-grafiek; maak ik zelf wel ?? (geen puzzelstukje)))

The duration of social-structural cycles is predicted to be roughly inversely proportional to speed and intensity of selection for the trait under discussion. In an industrial company the intensity of selection and the take-on/dismissal percentages are much higher than, for example, the selection intensity and the immigration/emigration percentages in the much larger units of political states. Therefore the average cycle periods are likely to vary from a few decades in companies or in political parties, to a few centuries in political states, or even to one or two millennia in whole civilizations.  

The small-scale turn-over cycles with a relatively stronger and quicker selection effect are superimposed, therefore, on the larger-scale turn-over cycles with a longer life span. Thus, individuals may be outcasts in terms of some small-scale social structure while at the same time being totally accepted incrowd members in terms of some larger-scale social structure. The small-scale cycles may be seen as the ripples on the surface of the long range waves of the large-scale cycles, What happens with a person at the social-role level of a sports club is not necessarily parallel to what happens to him at home or at the level of the village community, and what happens to a person on the level of a company does not at all need to be parallel to what happens to him on the level of the political state. In fact, being an incrowd group member on some small-scale level of organization may be vital for a person to keep functioning properly in case of struggling with an outcast position on a larger-scale level of organization.

If it were possible to manipulate these – hitherto involuntary – selection mechanisms, it would be possible to stop or to speed up population cycles at will. This might for instance be relevant for personnel management in industrial companies or for measures on the level of political nations. The latter might be of particular significance in our nuclear age, since population cycles on this broad level tend to be worked out and consolidated by means of war and other economic strangling techniques. Mankind as a whole, up until now, has been able to afford this luxury of genocidal praxis, but war and economic asphyxia, nowadays, threaten to come close to total nuclear destruction. It would be worthwhile, therefore, to take the pressure off the dynamic population cycles kettle and to search for a way to replace or short-circuit nature's hitherto applied selection tricks with which it powered our evolution and our spatial spreading and distribution. It seems about time to substitute alternative and less dangerous mechanisms for it.

For more detailed information about these selection forces in social groups and the resulting periodic turn over catastrophies click [[The_biological_instability_of_social_equilibria_(abstract)|'''here (**)''']]. Otherwise continue reading.

==  '''Human Blindness to the Self''', missing piece #1 ==

'''{{level|1}} A series of blocks to a rational and purposeful approach; strange effects from recent human evolution'''

Whereas in principle nowadays the technical means are available to tackle the above mentioned basic causes of periodic war and disaster, including the two causes mentioned above, there does not seem at present to be any broadly carried willingness to tackle these problems at a significant scale.  

The notion of genetic pollution is taboo if applied to human beings. The concept is only being applied to cattle.

Likewise, one may expect a strong resistance to applying counter measures to the automatic selection forces in favour of sociability and compliance and against self-will and creativity. Such an intitiative also would encounter a number of strong taboo's.

In us humans there are a number of strong built in factors that cause an unwillingness to consider the above mentioned issues and a range of other "sensitive" issues. We will mention four of these blocking factors here below.

=== The major Blindness Block, probably stemming from some 0,5 million to 2 million years ago ===

  ((mirror plus blindfold; zoals eerder, of een variant daarop))

'''1) {{level|1}} The first block''' is stemming from the innate tendency to not use our intelligence on our own behaviour. In fact there is the above mentioned strong built in block against utilising intelligence on the Self. As pointed out [[Point_Omega_(summary)#Self_Blindness_and_Social-role_Blindness|elsewhere on this Wiki '''(*)''']], this is an awareness block that must be some half million or more years old. It was an adaptation for our hominid ancestors who grew more and more intelligent, living in circumstances where high intelligence did pay off very well.  

As pointed out above, this adaptation, this block on the use of intelligence on the own behaviour, this '''blindness to the self''', helped circumvent the ordinary upper limit to intelligence that holds for any living animal species.  

Normally, in any reasonably intelligent animal species, intelligence cannot evolve beyond the point where it enables individuals to find short cuts to emotional satisfaction, avoiding the energy and time-consuming behaviours that would result from reacting "without thinking". The latter behaviours are the ones evolution has produced as best ways to survive and procreate, but if they get short-cutted by easier, more "clever" ways to short-term satisfaction, procreation is endangered and the too high intelligence level, enabling such short cuts, bites in its own tail and will be weeded out by natural selection.

In humans the evolution towards higher levels of intelligence than that specific, general maximum level, only became possible after innate blocks had formed that made the utilisation of intelligence on the own and each other's behaviour very difficult. And that was the "Blindness for the Self" we are facing now ([[Self-blindness in humans as prerequisite for the evolution of advanced intelligence|see here]] for more information on this innate Self-Blindness).

So, if we wish to regard and study the conditions to organise peace and stability for the long term and abolish war and political disasters, we would at the very least have to come to grips with this typically human innate blindness structure. If not, we will continue to live and interact like monkeys, but ............. monkeys with nuclear power.

  ((plaatje van chimpansee met machinegeweer en op achtergrond ontploffende atoombom (paddestoel) ))

=== Three more recent Blindness Blocks, stemming from 5.000 to 10.000 years ago ===

'''2) {{level|1}} The second block''' is because there has evolved, since some 10.000 years, cultural systems that wield complex '''taboo''' '''systems''', serving to maintain their power over people. These meme level power structures among other things incorporate a system of taboos that prevent us from investigating our own behaviour. This strengthens the already innate tendency to steer clear from meddling with the own and each other's behaviour. These taboos help to keep us even more stupid than we already were for innate reasons.  

  ((plaatje: sssst !!))

So, if we wish to understand the basics of the problems of war and peace we also will have to be willing to overcome a multitude of current cultural taboos.

'''3) The third block''' is stemming from us being saddled with a culturally induced level of '''neuroticism''' that prevents us from too much intelligent investigation of anything and, subsequently, also of our own behaviour. The more neurotic, the less space for intelligent investigation and the less danger for meddling with the norms imposed by the meme level power structures that are geared to help these impersonal power structures to survive and to spread. A higher level of neuroticism reduces the level of useful output of people, but on the other hand it does enhance the malleability of people and the possibilities to manipulate them. And that is a major and crucial advantage to the power structures in charge.

'''4) The fourth block''' is stemming from us maybe having lost part of our intelligence as compared with some 10.000 years ago. From the time the agricultural revolution began, there was a premium on docility and on fitting into large organizations. From that time on the impersonal meme level power structures took over command and these power structures were served better by docile subjects than by highly creative individualists. These power structures use a variety of techniques to keep their subjects under control. Among these tricks are systems of lies and superstition that increase the dependency of the subjects on the power structure, reducing the individual's capacity to deal with the environment at hand by themselves independently. Adaptation to such systems of counterfeit and superstition is more difficult when one is highly intelligent than when one is somewhat dull and mediocre. '''Intelligence makes adaptation to superstition and fairy tales difficult''' for reasons of cognitive dissonance.

Therefore it is likely that since the agricultural revolution there has been an on average a '''negative selection pressure on intelligence'''. Intelligence would pay off for members of the ruling class, which is always a minority, but it would often be a disadvantage for the survival chances of subordinate members in the power structure in question, which is always the great majority.

In other words: the power structures "breed" stupid and docile carriers for themselves.

  ((hamer op lampje --> begrip in scherven uiteen))

It would be worthwhile to find out if we can find data on the growth or decrease of average intelligence during the last 10.000 years. It might be an explanation for the finding that modern man has a somewhat lower brain volume than our ancestors from before the agricultural revolution.

Whether true or still an unwarranted hypothesis, this lower intelligence, lower than what we had before, could perhaps be another, fourth factor making it difficult for us to tackle the perennial problems of humanity effectively.

Obviously, we are at the very least saddled with a couple of serious handicaps, innate as well as learned. And we need to come to grips with those handicaps. We need to become masters over ourselves, again.

===  What we ''can'' do to un-block awareness ===

If we want to do something about understanding the predicaments of humanity and find remedies for the perennial problems, we obviously need to break through this multifacetted structure of ignorance and blindness that has evolved for very valid evolutionary reasons, but that are now posing some serious and dangerous handicaps.

We cannot do much about blocking factor 1). The innate blindness for our own behaviour is very old and is deeply and solidly ingrained in our system on a genetic level. This part of our specific stupidness and ignorance cannot be "unlearned".

And if blocking factor 4) is correct, than this is also something that we cannot hope to change within a few centuries. Genetic changes come slowly.

Blocking factors 2) and 3) however, are different.

If we would decide, we could tackle both blocking factor 2, the taboos, and blocking factor 3, artificial neuroticism, purposefully and diligently, and we can do that right now.

For more details about the above mentioned awareness blocks one may refer to the article [[Eating_from_the_Forbidden_Fruit|"Eating from the Forbidden Fruit" '''(**)''']], otherwise, please continue.

1) the basics of human learning and development,  

3) the human "blindness for the Self". We can start to understand the different reasons for this blindness. And then, understanding, we can try to tackle anew the eternal basic problems that have plagued humanity since time immemorial.

When investigating human history, it soon becomes apparent that it is impossible to avoid war and disaster from happening for longer periods of time. In fact, well organized societies have as their primary goal to prevent the individuals to make each others lives miserable by unpredictable violence and arbitrariness. The state holds a monopoly on the use of violence and sets rules for its subjects who enjoy a certain protection and peace in return for abiding to the rules.

However, no matter how well designed a political structure is set up and ran, it always appears to work for only a limited period of time. Sooner or later, but invariably, uncontrolled violence breaks out again, whether internally or with neighbouring states. A little study of history will suffice to demonstrate the validity of this rule.

Maybe this is just how it is and and is it biologically impossible and undesirable to organise eternal peace, and was it never meant to be. Maybe this is the case. In fact it does seem to be so, but nevertheless there appears to be a novel problem for humanity, which is the technological revolution and the means of destruction it has produced. We are now living in the nuclear age and we have acquired the potential to destroy the human population a couple of times over. Maybe this is a bit exaggerated and even in the case of a large nuclear shoot out there will always survive some people in some remote corners of the earth. But even if that is true, than still it seems totally unacceptable to let such a nuclear shoot out happen at all. Humanity would at the very least be thrown back to primitive circumstances and large areas of the world would become uninhabitable for ages. Obviously that is not what we want.

But, how to prevent further full swing wars ? We should find out about its causes and reasons one way or the other, and rather soon than late.

In the literature on war one finds a wealth of overviews and theories (see e.g., van der Dennen, 1995), but to date there does not seem to be one single theory of war and peace that is convincingly explaining it all at the required level of understanding. We hope to show on this Wiki that this is not very surprising, because of two of the above mentioned major factors / principles / mechanisms that are missing from all these theories and overviews, two principles that are absolutely indispensable for acquiring a full understanding of our human situation and the forces that rule war and peace.

'''2) Genetic pollution (piece # 7)'''

'''1)''' {{level|1}} One of these two factors we already described above. It is in the '''cyclic selection forces''' and concomitant changes in social structures, automatically '''causing periodic turn over catastrophies'''. This mechanism is up till now large and by unknown to researchers in the field. It is in itself enough to prevent any long term political structure to bring peace and well being in the long run. Sooner or later the internal selection process will have proceeded that far that a turn over catastrophy cannot be avoided any more, signalling the end of the (utopian) political arrangement.

From this mechanism we can derive '''one certain and indispensable condition''' in case we want to organise an end to periodic war and destruction. And that is that '''we have to become aware of this automatic selection process and we have to introduce some counter selection pressure'''.  

'''2)''' Another factor that would make it impossible to establish and maintain ever lasting political structures with peace and harmony for all, is the phenomenon of '''genetic pollution'''. This phenomenon does have a different genetic effect on the population in question, but its long term effect is similar. It also '''makes a long lasting structure of peace and harmony impossible'''.

This automatic biological effect on human populations '''can''' however '''also be countered with well directed measures'''. Parents in general wish to have healthy and successful children. Well, the technical means to achieve that are available and laying ready on the shelf nowadays. Also, there is no need any more to have unwanted children. No matter the resistance from the churches and other religious power structures, methods for birth control are spreading all over the world and will not be stopped from becoming "normal". In fact, the technical means are available to counter the effects of genetic pollution without the least measure of compulsion. And they certainly will be applied more and more. Mankind would then move from evolving gradually towards a higher level of consciousness into a situation of "evolving consciously".

For more details about the effects of genetic pollution click [[The_effects_of_genetic_pollution_on_political_structures_and_human_history|here '''(**)''']].

{{Level|1}} What is more, is that there seem to be developments in operation that "just will do it for us" with regard to taboos and induced neuroticism.

In order to see that more clearly, we have to take a closer look at the details of how the meme level power structures exactly keep us trapped and bound in slavery and in stupid blindness. Once we have a clear picture of how that works we also can recognise that many of the tools of repression of the power structures that keep us bound, are becoming unstable through recent technological developments.

We live in the middle of an '''information explosion'''. People are flooded with avalanches of information they can choose from. Also, they can find through internet information on most subjects they care about. Power structures used to lean among other things on important information privileges, depriving their subjects of most of the information available, thus preventing initiatives from that side quite effectively. This privilege was a powerful tool for power structures to maintain and consolidate their power, but through the new internet developments this highly powerful weapon of information exclusiveness is dwindling away rapidly. We live in the age of the democratization of information.

Taboos therefore can sooner and easier be unmasked for what they are, as mere stories of power structures full of do's and dont's, that dwindle away under scrutiny.

Second, '''birth control''' is spreading quickly all over the globe these days. This means that an ever higher percentage of the children is being '''born "wanted" and planned'''. That, in turn, means that in more cases the parents are prepared for the arduous task of bringing up the child successfully. And that, in turn, means that the child in question is more likely to receive proper amounts of love and attention that are needed for an optimal development (according to the CEL theory, describing the effect of [[Energy_and_Strokes|sufficient "strokes"]] '''(***)''' on children's development). This implies that less and less children are being brought up to become neurotic individuals with truncated behaviour patterns. A higher percentage will be able to "self-actualize", which implies more individuals being able to escape the clutches of the power structures that are trying to subdue them into a mild but steady state of neurotic slavery, contaminating also their neighbours and colleagues in the process.

Third: nowadays, there are a number of serious threats for the (pleasant) survival of mankind that force more and more people to think over thoroughly the human condition and the options that we have. There is mass pollution; there is the nuclear capacity to destroy the human species large and by or completely, waging war is nearing more and more to potential massive self-destruction. There is massive overpopulation; etc., etc. These '''urgencies trigger more awareness''' about our own situation and our own functioning than has been usually the case. Subsequently, this triggers attempts to overcome the innate blocks to being aware of and to thinking clearly about our own behaviour and our own (social) situation. Such increased awareness therefore sooner or later undermines the ultimate power of the meme structures in charge. In short, we gradually start realising that "'''we have no choice''' but to finally start understanding ourselves".

Fourth: like neuroticism, '''self-actualization also is very contagious'''. The communication explosion of this era reduces distances. Through the internet all sorts of groups emerge with increasing ease. Self-actualizers, historically a small minority, therefore also can easier find their likes nowadays. Critical sizes of self-actualizing groups can therefore develop easier and can eventually trigger chain reactions of contagious self-actualization. That will undermine the usual thoughtless and massive subservience to power structures.

We will return to this aspect below.

All these recent developments reduce the stability of the classical mechanisms by which power structures acquired stability and longevity, controlling their subjects ("carriers") sufficiently. Gradually, many of the millennia old fundaments of power start crumbling and are falling apart.

The above trends for instance '''loosen the taboo networks''' that keep human thought locked up and that are put in place and maintained by the local power structures in charge, religions and otherwise. As a result, the inborn as well as the induced unwillingness to consider the important issues for the human species are loosening up and more and more people start to direct their intelligence to the questions that really ''do'' matter. And one thing that they then automatically will stumble across, is details of how the power structures operate and how they maintained their power over them (us).

Another thing that the above modern trends bring closer, is a '''weakening of the artificially induced neuroticism''' in us humans that made us more stupid than what would be natural to our genetic endowment. So, this weakening of our neuroses is making us more clever and intelligent. That also induces a '''more intelligent investigation''' of what rules us and keeps us down. And that is bringing us closer and closer to a mass reversal from neuroticism to states of self actualization (point Omega).  

In order to see how these latter effects come about, a better understanding is necessary of how the human system of emotions and motivations operates. We should therefore take a closer look at the mechanisms of the CEL (Cognition Energy Learning model).

As explained in the chapters on the [[Towards_a_Cognition-Energy-Learning_Model (1)|CEL]]'''(***)''', our system of experiencing, learning and development entails strong positive feed back loops. That means that truncated and neurotic behaviours induce "positive" feed back loops, resulting in "negative" learning spirals in people, in themselves as well as in their neighbours. On the other hand, complete and fully actualized behaviours induce "positive" feed back loops resulting in "positive" learning spirals in people and in their neighbours.

In short, psychological well-being and self actualization are highly contagious, just as are neuroticism and lack of skills are contagious.

The result seems to be a gradual growth towards the point where the artificially induced mass neuroses cannot be upheld any more and where they will reverse into their opposite, causing "positive" feed back loops in the wholesome direction, producing an enhanced growth and development to mass health, vigor and actualization (Point Omega reversal), instead of the customary positive feed back loops producing neurotic misery.

(Click [[The significance of the Point Omega transition|here '''(***)''']] for more information on how the CEL mechanism will trigger a mass psychological chain reaction.)

In short, it looks like most of the mechanisms that have kept us down in misery, slavery and ignorance are losing their power these days, making it more and more probable for humanity to reach a critical percentage of self-actualizers, which will trigger a mass reversal to positive feed back loops in the wholesome direction instead of in the usual direction of neurotization, fear and mass stupidity. This change of direction, this shift in probability for self-actualization, is what we call the "'''Point Omega reversal".

So, whereas human beings will tend to grow towards higher levels of skills and stability, '''they will not so much report higher states of "happiness"''', simply because they use their own usual state as a reference point, not knowing anything else.

However, in such states there will be way less misery, as objectively measured. There will be more real equilibria and more structural stability.

Also, there will be much more room for creative exploration and innovation.

And since the gradual human evolution towards a higher consciousness will reverse into "conscious evolution", there may be a myriad of directions to choose from, in which directions we may steer our own evolution.

'''Superstition, taboos and false belief systems''' will disappear. The power structures will be seen for what they are, for how they operated and exerted power over us. Inducing ignorance and superstition will not work any more.

Instead, '''sobriety and unhampered intelligence will rule''' and be considered as "normal", not as inexplicable "strokes of genius", as they used to be regarded before.

'''Genetic pollution''' will stop being an automatic source of periodic catastrophical collapse, disaster, destruction and genocide. People will have started breeding consciously and will automatically generate a sufficient counter-force against genetic pollution.

The cycles in social structure of growing and aging, with the concomitant '''turn over catastrophes like bankruptcy, revolutions, genocide, etc., will be history''', since the previously automatic internal selection forces in social structures will be insightfully countered by purposeful, compensating selection forces.  

Our inborn weakness, hardly being able to observe ourselves and each other objectively, the characteristic '''"blindness" for the Self''', will be mollified by our awareness that this weakness is an innate human trait, but that we can intelligently and purposefully add sufficient awareness about the social and psychological mechanisms that are ruling our daily lives. Such initiative will not be hampered any longer by all sorts of cultural taboos and other tricks, blocking such awareness, the stings being removed from the meme level power structures.  

This also means that the extent to which human beings are able to understand one another and assist to one another, will move to a completely different and unprecedented high(er) level. The positive feed back loops in the "wholesome" direction, resulting from that, will in itself already '''stabilize mass self actualization'''.

Human unhappiness and suffering, as objectively measured, will be reduced to an unparalleled low level. However, this will not imply that the same holds at a subjective level. That is a completely different matter because subjective emotions are strongly relative and have a strongly "myopic" character.

The selection pressure in favour of extreme docile and uncritical behaviour will have evaporated.

Thus far a short listing of some of the changes we may expect after the Point Omega shift. (For more information on these changes [[Point_Omega_(summary)#Point_Omega_.2F_Mass_enlightenment|leading to '''(*)''']] and to be expected after Point Omega, [[Directives_for_after_Point_Omega|click here]] '''(*)'''.)

== '''In summary''' ..... ==

{{level|1}} We will now summarize in short the highlights of this guided tour through the Omega Research Wiki and provide further links to other articles and chapters on this Wiki.

This Wiki aims at providing a better insight in how we humans tick, in how our societies are run and about how we could avoid huge (e.g., nuclear) disasters. We have ended up in a rather dangerous global political and environmental situation. How can we survive ? And how can we make our fellow beings survive ?

In view of everything that is known and scientifically established, it should not be very difficult to (re-)organize our societies in such a way that the most crucial and common human problems and dangers are overcome and disappear. It is argued on this Wiki that the major problem is to mobilize all available knowledge and to remove the taboos and superstitions that until now blocked the intelligent use of the knowledge that is already available.

Four phenomena are indicated that are generally missing from our world view, but that are crucial for being able to understand the essentials of the present human situation.

The '''dynamics of human learning and development''', based on '''"[[Point_Omega_(summary)#Reversal_Theory_of_Emotions_and_Motivations|'''Reversal Theory''''' (*)''']](# 2)"'''. The organization of the dynamics of emotions and motivations implies a strong contageousness of psychological health, but also of neuroticism. This holds within individuals as well as at the social level. Without a solid understanding of [[The evolutionary stability of a bi-stable system of emotions and motivations in species with an open-ended capacity for learning|Reversal Theory]] '''(***)''' and of the [[Towards_a_Cognition-Energy-Learning_Model|CEL (Cognition Energy Learning model) '''(***)''']], the reasons for the present human situation and the possibilities that we have instead, can never be understood well. So, we need to understand Reversal Theory and the CEL.

Within social groups and structures there is an automatic and up till now unhampered selection pressure in favour of sociable adaptation and against creative individualism. This results in a limited life span of any social structure or institution. Social structures always carry a time bomb within, fueled by [[The_biological_instability_of_social_equilibria|'''automatic social selection cycles''']] '''(***)(# 9)'''. When social structures collapse at the end of their life span and are replaced by fresh, smaller structures, the turn over catastrophes go by the names of dissolution, bankruptcy, revolution, war or genocide.

Since this mechanism always, since primordial times, has been the engine behind the periodic reshuffling of the gene pool and the concomitant catastrophes, it is absolutely impossible to understand even vaguely the source of much of human misery, let alone to be able to do something about it, without knowledge of these automatic social selection cycles.

The typical [[Point_Omega_(summary)#Self_Blindness_and_Social-role_Blindness|'''human blindness for the self''']] '''(*)(# 1)'''. This is the innate incapacity to utilize our intelligence for understanding our own and each other's behaviour. This is a consequence of the higher than "normal" human intelligence and it developed since some quarter million to two million years ago, when one line of hominids escaped from the ordinary evolutionary "upper intelligence limit".  

Since the agricultural revolution, some 10.000 years ago, the power in human societies is in the "hands" of impersonal meme-level information structures. These [[Point_Omega_(summary)#Impersonal_power_structures_ruling_our_world|'''meme-level power structures''']] '''(*)(# 3)''' compete with one another and cause an evolution on the meme level that is running much faster than the gene-level evolution of our physical properties. This causes a [[Point_Omega_(summary)#Impersonal_power_structures_ruling_our_world|structural friction in us humans]] '''(*)''', being subject to selection  pressures on the meme level that leave the gene level adaptations lagging hopelessly behind.

Ordinary human psychological functioning is strongly determined and coloured by this evolutionary friction.

Other than the above 4 mechanisms, the following phenomena are more commonly known, but often not considered in the context that we need here.

'''Superstition and ignorance''' in human society and [[Eating_from_the_Forbidden_Fruit#The_evolutionary_importance_of_blindness_for_self_and_the_illusion_of_Good_and_Bad|their evolutionary role]] '''(**)(# 5)'''.

'''Taboos''' and their function in human societies. '''(# 6)'''

[[The_effects_of_genetic_pollution_on_political_structures_and_human_history|'''Genetic pollution''']] '''(**)''' and its effects in human societies. '''(# 7)'''

Disfunctioning and '''neuroticism''' versus optimal development and well being in individuals; the technical reversibility of these processes and a strong [[Energy_and_Strokes#2.10._.22Contagiousness.22_of_Interpersonal_Psychological_Skills_and_Adaptation|contagiousness]] '''(***)''' in both directions. '''(# 8)'''

'''Selection pressure in societies''' [[Point_Omega_(summary)#Impersonal_power_structures_ruling_our_world|'''in favour of docile behaviour''']] '''(*)(# 9)'''.

To the superficial observer it may seem rather counter-productive to carry a mechanism that functions as a time bomb underneath every social structure, being the cause of an eventual catastrophic turn over event. Such catastrophic events normally bring with them large percentages of the population to be expelled or terminated in a direct or less direct way. This seems like an enormous waste of energy, skills and capacity in the system.  

However, this is not surprising after all, since the resulting selection pressure going with such turn over catastrophes more than counterbalances the very proximate disadvantages and misery for the individuals who are in the middle of such a turn over catastrophy. The advantages of such catastrophes for the gene pool are obvious. Many individuals will appear not to be able to handle the changing circumstances during a turn over in the social structure in question. They contribute less to the next generation. The badly needed selection pressure resumes its necessary role.

Those who stay in the gene pool, are likely to migrate and recombine in different groups and gene pools. The catastrophes make the genes move through their pool or even cross over to other gene pools. This is very beneficial to the gene pools as a whole.

So, this seemingly counter-productive social selection system producing periodic turn over catastrophes, can very well be part of Evolutionarily Stable Strategies (ESS). Therefore it should not surprise us that such a mechanism exists in all socially living mammal species.

However, these cyclic selection processes, that have ruled our social and political lives always, like in any other socially living mammal species, are not affordable any more for Homo sapiens. The turn over catastrophes have become too great dangers to be able to afford them any longer. The technological developments have made war, genocide and revolutions too risky to allow them to carry on unconsciously and involuntarily as they always used to do.

We simply have no choice but to start to understand these mechanisms and then subsequently steer these processes consciously and rationally in the desired direction, taking the sting and the pushing power out of the "periodic catastrophy" machine.

This, together with '''genetic pollution (# 7)''', always has been the cause of periodic redistribution of gene pools over the inhabitable areas of land, also triggering migration waves. Once understood, we can deal with both mechanisms without much difficulty.  

After the agricultural revolution started, a number of other mechanisms have emerged that helped to secure the periodic emergence of catastrophy, disaster and misery. These mechanisms are stemming from the demands from the meme level power structures that are ruling human life since. We mentioned, among other things, "superstition", "induced ignorance", "taboos", commonly induced and stabilised "neuroticism", etc., and we also mentioned the mechanisms by which these conditions are induced and stabilised by the meme level power structures.

This is the end of this summary. Point Omega will come, whether we try to induce it or not. A number of developments that come about automatically and unavoidably, will autonomously trigger the emergence of that Point Omega. It will be an autonomous and automatic process. This Wiki can help the reader to be prepared. '''That's all we need to do'''. The rest will follow by itself automatically. Enjoy the ride !

Thanks for your attention.

For returning to the start of this Guided Tour, click [[A_guided_tour_through_this_Wiki|here]] '''(*)'''.

'''(*)''' If you wish to support the work on this Wiki you can do two things for us:

You can copy this Wiki. This will prevent any party that feels threatened through it contents, from effectively destroying it. Copies will exist all over the place and the information gathered here cannot be undone any more. For copying instructions, '''click''' [[Omega_Research:Site_support#Copy this wiki (our version of 'CopyRight')|'''''here''''']].

You can send us a donation. (Click [[Omega Research:Site support|'''''here''''']]) Your donation will be used to improve and spread the contents of this Wiki and to support the scientific research behind it.